
arXiv: 2012.06186
Abstract The issue of writer identification and writer retrieval, which is considered a challenging problem in the field of document analysis and recognition is addressed here.. A novel pipeline is proposed for the problem at hand by employing a unified neural network architecture consisting of the ResNet‐20 as a feature extractor and an integrated NetVLAD layer, inspired by the vector of locally aggregated descriptors (VLAD), in the head of the latter part. Having defined this architecture, the triplet semi‐hard loss function is used to directly learn an embedding for individual input image patches. Subsequently, the generalised max‐pooling technique is employed for the aggregation of embedded descriptors of each handwritten image. Also, a novel re‐ranking strategy is introduced for the task of identification and retrieval based on the k ‐reciprocal nearest neighbours, and it is shown that the pipeline can benefit tremendously from this step. Experimental evaluation has been done on the three publicly available datasets: the ICDAR 2013, CVL, and KHATT datasets. Results indicate that while the performance was comparable to the state‐of‐the‐art KHATT, the writer identification and writer retrieval pipeline achieve superior performance on the ICDAR 2013 and CVL datasets in terms of mAP.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Electronic computers. Computer science, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, QA75.5-76.95, Information Retrieval (cs.IR), Computer Science - Information Retrieval
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Electronic computers. Computer science, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, QA75.5-76.95, Information Retrieval (cs.IR), Computer Science - Information Retrieval
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
