Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Neurochem...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Neurochemistry
Article . 1994 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Comparison of the Potency of Competitive NMDA Antagonists Against the Neurotoxicity of Glutamate and NMDA

Authors: Elias Aizenman; Karen A. Hartnett; Rachel C. Blitzblau; Paul A. Rosenberg; Elizabeth K. Speliotes;

Comparison of the Potency of Competitive NMDA Antagonists Against the Neurotoxicity of Glutamate and NMDA

Abstract

Abstract: The object of this investigation was to determine whether glutamate uptake affects the apparent potency of the competitive antagonists dl‐2‐amino‐5‐phosphonovalerate and CGS‐19755 in blocking NMDA receptor‐mediated neurotoxicity. In astrocyte‐rich rat cortical cultures we observed that dl‐2‐amino‐5‐phosphonovalerate and CGS‐19755 were 24 and 16 times more potent against NMDA than against glutamate‐induced toxicity. In contrast, dl‐2‐amino‐5‐phosphonovalerate was equipotent against the two agonists in astrocyte‐poor cultures, in which dendrites are directly exposed to the extracellular medium. With the noncompetitive NMDA antagonist MK‐801, similar potencies were observed against glutamate (212 ± 16 nM) and against NMDA (155 ± 9 nM) neurotoxicity. These results may be explained if we assume that the neuronal cell body is less susceptible than the dendrites to NMDA receptor‐mediated toxicity, and that the action of glutamate in astrocyte‐rich cultures is confined to the cell body. In this case, one would expect that higher concentrations of glutamate would be needed to produce toxicity in astrocyte‐rich cultures, and that higher concentrations of competitive antagonists would be needed to overcome this toxicity. Our observations help explain the pharmacology of the competitive NMDA antagonists against NMDA receptor‐mediated neurotoxicity but also suggest the possibility that, because the cell body and dendrites may be distinct sites for neurotoxicity, they might also involve different mechanisms of toxicity.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Cerebral Cortex, Neurons, N-Methylaspartate, Cell Survival, Glutamic Acid, Dendrites, Embryo, Mammalian, Binding, Competitive, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Rats, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, 2-Amino-5-phosphonovalerate, Glutamates, Astrocytes, Pipecolic Acids, Animals, Dizocilpine Maleate, Cells, Cultured

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    24
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
24
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?