Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Ultrasound in Obstet...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Article . 1996 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Nuchal translucency measurement: training of potential examiners

Authors: Richard W Morris; Jeffrey M. Braithwaite; Rezan A. Kadir; P. J. Thompson; Demetrios L. Economides; T. A. Pepera;

Nuchal translucency measurement: training of potential examiners

Abstract

AbstractThe aim of this study was to assess a training regimen for nuchal translucency measurement by transabdominal (TAS) and transvaginal sonography (TVS). After initial instruction regarding the criteria for correct nuchal translucency measurement, trainees (A and B) and an experienced examiner (C) performed nuchal translucency measurements on fetuses of 10–13 weeks' gestation, and the trainees' ability to obtain a measurement, repeatability and levels of agreement were assessed. In addition, a further experienced examiner (D) performed nuchal translucency measurements to validate the training regimen.Examiner C obtained nuchal translucency measurements in 94% by TAS, 93% by TVS and 100% by a combination of both scan modes. The repeatability coefficient was 0.40 mm and 0.24 mm for TAS and TVS, respectively. Trainees A and B were considered trained after 80 and 100 scans with TAS and TVS, respectively. They were considered trained when they could consistently obtain measurements that were of comparable repeatability and comparable levels of agreement with those of examiner C. The trainees' difficulties with TAS were in achieving satisfactory repeatability and levels of agreement, but with TVS it was ability in obtaining a measurement. We propose the training methods, standards and criteria used in this study as the basis for training sonographers in nuchal translucency measurements. Copyright © 1996 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Related Organizations
Keywords

Chromosome Aberrations, Health Personnel, Reproducibility of Results, Chromosome Disorders, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Fetal Diseases, Pregnancy, Medical Laboratory Science, Humans, Female, Clinical Competence, Neck

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    61
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
61
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze