
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>We analyse and compare the clustering of young stars in Chamaeleon I and Taurus. We compute the mean surface-density of companion stars \bar{N} as a function of angular displacement ��from each star. We then fit \bar{N}(��) with two simultaneous power laws. For Chamaeleon I, the exponents of the power laws are 1.97 and 0.28, with the elbow at ~0.011 degrees. For Taurus, we obtain 2.02 and 0.87, with the elbow at ~0.013 deg. For both star clusters the observational data make quite large systematic excursions from the best fitting curve in the binary regime. These excursions may be attributable to evolutionary effects of the types discussed recently by Nakajima et al. and Bate et al. In the clustering regime the data conform to the best fitting curve very well. We also calculate the box-dimensions for the two star clusters. However, the limited dynamic range makes these estimates simply descriptors of the large-scale clustering, and not admissible evidence for fractality. We also propose two algorithms for objectively generating maps of constant stellar surface-density in young star clusters. Such maps are useful for comparison with molecular-line and dust-continuum maps of star-forming clouds, and with the results of numerical simulations. These maps retain information which is suppressed in the evaluation of \bar{N}(��). Analyzing such maps can be used to discriminate between fractal structure and single-level clustering, and to determine the degree of central condensation in small-N clusters. Algorithm I uses a universal smoothing length, and therefore has a restricted dynamic range, but it is implicitly normalized. Algorithm II uses a local smoothing length, which gives it much greater dynamic range, but it has to be normalized explicitly.
12 pages, 8 figures, using MN latex style, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Astrophysics (astro-ph), FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics
Astrophysics (astro-ph), FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
