
pmid: 11576433
SummaryThe future development and use of agricultural biotechnology has been challenged by two preliminary studies indicating potential risk to monarch butterfly populations by pollen from corn engineered to express proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis. Likewise, these studies have also challenged the way in which science should be performed, published in scientific journals and communicated to the public at large. Herein, we provide a history of the monarch controversy to date. We believe a retrospective view may be useful for providing insights into the proper roles and responsibilities of scientists, the media and public agencies and the consequences when they go awry.
Insecticides, Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins, Bacterial Toxins, Agriculture, Public Policy, Plants, Genetically Modified, Zea mays, United States, Endotoxins, Hemolysin Proteins, Bacterial Proteins, Public Opinion, Animals, Pest Control, Biological, Butterflies, Biotechnology
Insecticides, Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins, Bacterial Toxins, Agriculture, Public Policy, Plants, Genetically Modified, Zea mays, United States, Endotoxins, Hemolysin Proteins, Bacterial Proteins, Public Opinion, Animals, Pest Control, Biological, Butterflies, Biotechnology
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 54 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
