Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Ultrasound in Obstet...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Article . 2001 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Measurement of fetal nuchal translucency thickness by three‐dimensional ultrasound

Authors: Paul, C; Krampl, E; Skentou, C; Jurkovic, D; Nicolaides, K H;

Measurement of fetal nuchal translucency thickness by three‐dimensional ultrasound

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and repeatability of nuchal translucency thickness measurement using three‐dimensional ultrasound.MethodsForty consecutive women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies attending for Down syndrome screening at 11–14 weeks' gestation were included in this prospective crossover trial. Nuchal translucency thickness was measured using both two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional ultrasound. In each case two three‐dimensional volumes were recorded and then examined by using the technique of planar reformatted sections. The initial plane of the first volume always contained a clear image of the nuchal region (‘sagittal volume’), whilst the initial plane of the second volume was selected randomly regardless of fetal position (‘random volume’). The repeatability of nuchal translucency measurement was examined by constructing a scatter diagram of the difference between the measurements plotted against the mean of two readings.ResultsNuchal translucency measurements could be repeated in 38/40 (95%) sagittal volumes and 24/40 (60%) random volumes. The mean difference between two‐dimensional measurements and those obtained by reslicing of sagittal three‐dimensional volumes was −0.097 mm (95% limits of agreement from −0.481 to 0.675) and 0.225 mm (95% limits of agreement from −0.369 to 0.819) when random volumes were examined.ConclusionsReslicing of stored three‐dimensional volumes can be used to replicate nuchal translucency measurements only when nuchal skin can also be clearly seen on two‐dimensional ultrasound. Copyright © 2001 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Keywords

Cross-Over Studies, 610, Reproducibility of Results, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Pregnancy, 617, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Down Syndrome, Neck

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    33
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
33
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?