Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Using Simultaneous Nasometry and Standard Audio Recordings to Detect the Acoustic Onsets and Offsets of Speech

Authors: E J, Seaver; R M, Dalston;

Using Simultaneous Nasometry and Standard Audio Recordings to Detect the Acoustic Onsets and Offsets of Speech

Abstract

Simultaneously collected nasometric and standard audio recording data were compared to determine the extent to which the acoustic onsets and offsets of speech could be determined from Nasometric signals. Three male and 2 female subjects produced six repetitions of 12 utterances that were initiated and terminated by vowels and consonants of differing phonetic features. The onset of Nasometer output typically followed output from the standard audio recording system by an average of 29 ms ( SD = 36.1 ms). A greater temporal discrepancy was observed for signal offsets (mean Nasometer lag = 100 ms; SD = 83.3 ms). Large differences between the two instruments seemed due to differences in their overall sensitivities. The results suggest that the Nasometer may be of limited value in determining the acoustic onsets and offsets of speech. The Nasometer was not designed to sense the acoustic events studied here, and the current results have no bearing whatsoever on the validity of this instrument in providing information concerning nasal resonance.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Observer Variation, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Nose, Speech Acoustics, Speech Production Measurement, Tape Recording, Humans, Speech, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!