Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Magnitude Estimation of Loudness II

Loudness Perception in Presbycusic Listeners
Authors: K K, Knight; R H, Margolis;

Magnitude Estimation of Loudness II

Abstract

Because clinical methods most commonly used for assessing loudness are indirect measures that require one normal or near normal ear, loudness perception has not been studied thoroughly in listeners with symmetrical hearing loss. In this investigation, loudness perception was studied in three groups of listeners: normal listeners, listeners with asymmetrical sensorineural hearing loss, and individuals with bilaterally symmetrical hearing impairment due to presbycusis. In Experiment 1, a Magnitude Estimation of Loudness (ME) technique was compared to Alternate Binaural Loudness Balance (ABLB) results for subjects with asymmetrical hearing impairment. Results indicate that ME and ABLB measurements produce similar evidence of abnormally rapid growth of loudness in asymmetrically impaired listeners. In Experiment 2, loudness growth in individuals with normal hearing or with presbycusic hearing impairment was determined from ME measurements. Although presbycusic subjects tended to have steeper loudness functions than normal subjects, the differences did not reach statistical significance except at 6000 Hz, suggesting that, as a group, presbycusic listeners display little, if any, recruitment of loudness.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Loudness Perception, Middle Aged, Presbycusis, Hyperacusis, Audiometry, Pure-Tone, Humans, Female, Pitch Perception, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    25
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
25
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!