Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Visual Backward Masking of Selected Visemes

Authors: A D, Teigland; W R, Wilson;

Visual Backward Masking of Selected Visemes

Abstract

Five adult subjects with normal hearing and vision viewed tachistoscopically projected photographs of a talker uttering six phonemes. Experiment 1 determined discrimination of the visemes as a function of exposure duration (12–14 msec) and demonstrated that recognition of certain lip postures was a direct function of duration whereas for other postures duration appeared to interact with other variables. In Experiment 2, fixed duration stimuli (17 msec) were followed immediately by a variable duration masking stimulus (12–45 msec), and in Experiment 3 the test stimuli varied (22—52 msec) and the masking stimulus was fixed (45 reset). Results showed that under both conditions test stimuli were masked when the masker was at least as long as the test stimuli. In Experiment 4, the test stimuli and masking stimulus were held constant (15 msec and 45 msec, respectively) while a variable (7—37 msec) ISI was interposed. Delaying the masker did not improve recognition scores. Conclusions were (a) lip postures are subject to backward recognition masking and the effect varies in degree; (b) the processing of lip postures begins with a short-term storage of the posture; and (c) the initial stage of perceptual processing requires more than 37 msec. To the extent that this task parallels the speechreading process, the results would not support training procedures based at the level of single visemes.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Time Factors, Adolescent, Lipreading, Discrimination, Psychological, Phonetics, Humans, Female, Perceptual Masking

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!