Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The Confusion of English Consonant Clusters in Lipreading

Authors: J R, Franks; J, Kimble;

The Confusion of English Consonant Clusters in Lipreading

Abstract

Confusions in the lipreading of initial consonant clusters were investigated. Responses were obtained from 275 subjects asked to identify by lipreading 32 cluster-vowel nonsense syllables spoken by three different speakers. The results indicated that the consonant clusters were highly confused in lipreading, since they were incorrectly perceived 89% of the time. The clusters were seen most frequently as single consonants followed in frequency by identification as other consonant combinations. The confusions for each stimulus cluster were tested statistically to determine whether their frequency of occurrence might be attributable to chance. The confusions found not to be attributable to chance fell into seven visually contrastive groups. Confusions among sounds produced in similar articulatory positions were prominent.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Lipreading, Motion Pictures, Discrimination, Psychological, Phonetics, Humans, Female, Cues

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Top 10%
Top 1%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!