
pmid: 26660933
The purpose of this investigation was to study the effectiveness of different "noise reduction" circuits for subjects of differing degrees, configurations, and experience with amplification. Fifty subjects with hearing impairment were randomly assigned one of four circuit types whose marketing claims suggested resultant improvement in speech recognition in noise backgrounds. Although no apparent circuit superiority was shown, the subjects indicated a high level of satisfaction with the hearing aids chosen for them. Improved measuring tools, improved fitting strategies, and overall improved hearing-aid circuitry (though probablynotthe noise reduction feature) may explain this level of satisfaction.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
