Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Enhancement of repopulation haemopoiesis by heterozygous connexin 43 stem cells seeded on wild-type connexin 43 stroma

Authors: Martin, Rosendaal; Mervyn, Stone;

Enhancement of repopulation haemopoiesis by heterozygous connexin 43 stem cells seeded on wild-type connexin 43 stroma

Abstract

The present paper analyses the results of competitive blood-cell repopulation experiments in which Cx43-WT (connexin 43 wild-type) host mice, whose own HSCs (haemopoietic stem cells) were deleted, were grafted with fetal liver cells: 50% Gpi-1a (glucose phosphate isomerase-1a)/Cx43-WT cells competing with 50% Gpi-1b/Cx43-WT, 50% Gpi-1b/Cx43-HZ (heterozygous) or 50% Gpi-1b/Cx43-KO (knock-out) cells. The percentages of platelets, granulocytes, red cells, B-cells and T-cells containing Gpi-1b in blood samples obtained from 22 to 186 days after grafting, and the percentages of high-proliferation-potential colony-forming cells containing Gpi-1b at 255 days after grafting, were measured. The results show that, if we wait 4 months so that we measure the percentages of Gpi-1b end-cells formed by initially resting stem cells in the graft, values in HZ mice are greater than those in WT and KO mice by 10% or more. We propose a bipolar influence model for blood formation by grafted HSCs to explain this difference and other features of the data. Influence A is a direct one: for individual HSCs, the combined effect on HSC niching and HSC proliferation of Cx43 is superior to that of the KO allele. Influence B is a demographic one: HZ foundation mice compensate by having more HSCs than WT mice. The net outcome of influences A and B is that HZ is the winner.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Blood Platelets, Mice, Knockout, B-Lymphocytes, Heterozygote, Erythrocytes, Genotype, Cell Culture Techniques, Glucose-6-Phosphate Isomerase, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Hematopoiesis, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Liver, Connexin 43, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Linear Models, Animals, Biomarkers, Granulocytes

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!