Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Xenotransplantation: Immune Barriers beyond Hyperacute Rejection

Authors: Anthony Dorling; Robert I. Lechler;

Xenotransplantation: Immune Barriers beyond Hyperacute Rejection

Abstract

1. The use of organs from animal donors (xenotransplantation) is a potential solution to the chronic shortage of allogeneic organs and currently the pig is thought to be the most suitable donor for man. However, porcine organs are rejected rapidly by a vascular process called hyperacute rejection which has so far prevented clinical xenotransplantation. Although it is likely that this barrier will be overcome in the near future by the application of novel strategies, probably involving the use of organs from transgenic pigs, data from animal models indicate that multiple other immune mechanisms will contribute to the rejection of xenografts. 2. We have described two aspects of these immune mechanisms. First, the phenomenon of ‘accommodation’, whereby xenografts acquire in vivo resistance to vascular rejection, has been explored in an in vitro model utilizing immortalized porcine endothelial cells. The results indicate that human anti-pig antibodies induce a concentration-dependent and time-dependent change in porcine endothelial cells compatible with the development of accommodation. 3. Secondly, the in vitro human anti-porcine T-cell response has been documented in detail, with particular emphasis on quantitative and qualitative comparisons with the in vitro T-cell alloresponse. The results of this work, which indicate that the response to porcine xenografts is likely to be significantly stronger than that against allografts, have important implications for the level of conventional immunosuppression that may be necessary to prevent xenograft rejection, and provide an important basis for the development of strategies to promote xenograft-specific immunosuppression and tolerance.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!