
Humans are variously and continuously exposed to a wide range of different DNA-damaging agents, some of which are classed as carcinogens. DNA damage can arise from exposure to exogenous agents, but damage from endogenous processes is probably far more prevalent. That said, epidemiological studies of migrant populations from regions of low cancer risk to high cancer risk countries point to a role for environmental and/or lifestyle factors playing a pivotal part in cancer aetiology. One might reasonably surmise from this that carcinogens found in our environment or diet are culpable. Exposure to carcinogens is associated with various forms of DNA damage such as single-stand breaks, double-strand breaks, covalently bound chemical DNA adducts, oxidative-induced lesions and DNA–DNA or DNA–protein cross-links. This review predominantly concentrates on DNA damage induced by the following carcinogens: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, heterocyclic aromatic amines, mycotoxins, ultraviolet light, ionising radiation, aristolochic acid, nitrosamines and particulate matter. Additionally, we allude to some of the cancer types where there is molecular epidemiological evidence that these agents are aetiological risk factors. The complex role that carcinogens play in the pathophysiology of cancer development remains obscure, but DNA damage remains pivotal to this process.
Male, Lung Neoplasms, DNA Repair, Neoplasms, Benzo(a)pyrene, Animals, Humans, Amines, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Review Articles, Inflammation, Smoking, Prostatic Neoplasms, DNA, C741, Diet, Oxidative Stress, Cross-Linking Reagents, Carcinogens, Aristolochic Acids, Female, DNA Damage
Male, Lung Neoplasms, DNA Repair, Neoplasms, Benzo(a)pyrene, Animals, Humans, Amines, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Review Articles, Inflammation, Smoking, Prostatic Neoplasms, DNA, C741, Diet, Oxidative Stress, Cross-Linking Reagents, Carcinogens, Aristolochic Acids, Female, DNA Damage
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 215 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
