
AbstractThe presence of knots has been observed in a small fraction of single-domain proteins and related to their thermodynamic and kinetic properties. The exchanging of identical structural elements, typical of domain-swapped proteins, makes such dimers suitable candidates to validate the possibility that mutual entanglement between chains may play a similar role for protein complexes. We suggest that such entanglement is captured by the linking number. This represents, for two closed curves, the number of times that each curve winds around the other. We show that closing the curves is not necessary, as a novel parameter G′, termed Gaussian entanglement, is strongly correlated with the linking number. Based on 110 non redundant domain-swapped dimers, our analysis evidences a high fraction of chains with a significant intertwining, that is with |G′| > 1. We report that Nature promotes configurations with negative mutual entanglement and surprisingly, it seems to suppress intertwining in long protein dimers. Supported by numerical simulations of dimer dissociation, our results provide a novel topology-based classification of protein-swapped dimers together with some preliminary evidence of its impact on their physical and biological properties.
Quantitative Biology - Biomolecules, Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech), FOS: Biological sciences, Soft Condensed Matter (cond-mat.soft), FOS: Physical sciences, Biomolecules (q-bio.BM), Condensed Matter - Soft Condensed Matter, Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics, Article
Quantitative Biology - Biomolecules, Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech), FOS: Biological sciences, Soft Condensed Matter (cond-mat.soft), FOS: Physical sciences, Biomolecules (q-bio.BM), Condensed Matter - Soft Condensed Matter, Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics, Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 36 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
