Erratum: On the use of composite analyses to form physical hypotheses: An example from heat wave – SST associations

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 24 Aug 2016 Australia English Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLCJournal:Scientific Reports, volume 6 (eissn: 2045-2322,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Boschat, G; Simmonds, I; Purich, A; Cowan, T; Pezza, AB;

doi: 10.1038/srep31676

pmid: 27555099

pmc: PMC4995506

handle: 11343/214763

Erratum: On the use of composite analyses to form physical hypotheses: An example from heat wave – SST associations

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Scientific Reports 6: Article number: 29599; published online: 14 July 2016; updated: 24 August 2016 This Article contains an error in the legend of Table 1. “Results are computed for the entire 3150 days in DJF (black values) and for the 25 HW days selected in DJF (bold italic) during 1979–2014,” should read:

Country

Australia

Related Organizations

University of Melbourne
Australia

Keywords

Erratum, 530

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average