
AbstractSonodynamic therapy (SDT) has become a new modality for cancer therapy through activating certain chemical sensitizers by ultrasound (US). Discovery and development of novel sonosensitizers are attracting extensive attentions. Here, we introduce IR-780 iodide, a lipophilic heptamethine dye with a peak optical absorption of 780 nm wavelength, which can function as SDT agents for breast cancer treatment. Thein vitrocellular uptake, cell viability and the generation levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) were examined by using 4T1 breast cancer cells incubated with various concentrations of IR-780 followed by US irradiation. Our results showed a dose- and time-dependent cellular uptake of IR-780 iodide in 4T1 cancer cells. Significant lower viabilities and more necrotic/apoptotic cells were found when these cancer cells were treated with IR-780 iodide with US irradiation. Further analyzing the generation of ROS demonstrated significant increase of1O2level and H2O2, but not ⋅OH in the SDT-treated cells. Thein vivoanti-tumor efficacy of SDT with IR-780 revealed significant tumor growth inhibition of xenografts of 4T1 cancer cells; it was further confirmed by histological analysis and TUNEL staining. Our results strongly suggest that SDT combined with IR-780 may provide a promising strategy for tumor treatment with minimal side effects.
Indoles, Time Factors, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Cell Survival, Ultrasonic Therapy, Breast Neoplasms, Combined Modality Therapy, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Article, Mice, Cell Line, Tumor, Animals, Humans, Female, Reactive Oxygen Species
Indoles, Time Factors, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Cell Survival, Ultrasonic Therapy, Breast Neoplasms, Combined Modality Therapy, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Article, Mice, Cell Line, Tumor, Animals, Humans, Female, Reactive Oxygen Species
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 106 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
