
Recently the Medical Devices Agency recommended that 'ophthalmic devices that touch the surface of the eye should be restricted to single use'.To evaluate one such device: a disposable tonometer prism for routine applanation tonometry.The intraocular pressure (IOP) of 100 consecutive patients from a general eye clinic (197 eyes) was measured with both a disposable and the standard Goldmann tonometer (Goldmann). The level of agreement between the two methods of clinical measurement was assessed and the sensitivity and specificity of the disposable prism in detecting clinically significant raised IOP estimated.The mean difference in IOP measured by the two different prisms was 0.44 mmHg with a standard deviation (SD) of 1.54. The mean IOP for the disposable prism was 19.51 mmHg (SD 6.53 mmHg). The mean IOP for the standard Goldmann tonometer prism was 19.07 mmHg (SD 6.64 mmHg). The sensitivity to detect IOP > 21 mmHg was 95.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 86.0-99.5%) and the specificity of 93.9% (95% CI: 88.8-97.2%). It gave a positive predictive value of 83.9% (95% CI: 71.7-92.4%).There was close agreement between the IOP measurements obtained by the disposable tonometer prism and the Goldmann device for high and low pressures. If replicated, the high sensitivity and specificity would justify its use in screening.
Adult, Cross Infection, Tonometry, Ocular, Ultraviolet Rays, Predictive Value of Tests, Sterilization, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Ocular Hypertension, Disposable Equipment, Sensitivity and Specificity, Intraocular Pressure
Adult, Cross Infection, Tonometry, Ocular, Ultraviolet Rays, Predictive Value of Tests, Sterilization, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Ocular Hypertension, Disposable Equipment, Sensitivity and Specificity, Intraocular Pressure
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
