
In contrast to most peripheral tissues where multiple subtypes of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) coexist, with each of them playing its part in the orchestra of parasympathetic innervation, the myocardium has been traditionally considered to possess a single mAChR subtype. Although there is much evidence to support the notion that one receptor subtype (M2) orchestrates myocardial muscarinic transduction, there is emerging evidence that M1 and M3 receptors are also expressed and are of potential physiological, pathophysiological and pharmacological relevance. Clarifying this issue has a profound impact on our thinking about the cholinergic control of the heart function and disease and approaches to new drug development for the treatment of heart disease associated with parasympathetic dysfunction. This review article presents evidence for the presence of the M3 receptor subtype in the heart, and analyzes the controversial data from published pharmacological, functional and molecular studies. The potential roles of the M3 receptors, in parasympathetic control of heart function under normal physiological conditions and in heart failure, myocardial ischemia and arrhythmias, are discussed. On the basis of these considerations, we have made some proposals concerning the future of myocardial M3 receptor research.British Journal of Pharmacology (2004) 142, 395–408. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705787
Receptor, Muscarinic M3, Receptor, Muscarinic M2, Heart Diseases, Myocardium, Animals, Humans, Heart, Ligands
Receptor, Muscarinic M3, Receptor, Muscarinic M2, Heart Diseases, Myocardium, Animals, Humans, Heart, Ligands
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 116 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
