
pmid: 11022383
A randomised controlled trial to determine the acceptability to dentists and patients of cavity preparation with an Erbium:YAG laser as compared with conventional handpieces.Fifteen dentists (9 GDPs, 1 community dentist and 5 hospital dentists) treated 77 patients (age range 3.5-68 years old) who had two matched cavities, in a split mouth, randomised trial. One cavity was prepared conventionally, the other with the laser, with dentist and patient preference determined by questionnaire.In the majority of cases, where dentists expressed a preference, it was for conventional cavity preparation, and this was significant (P or = 10 years who expressed a preference, preferred laser treatment, and this was significant (P or = 10 years old preferred laser treatment. Patients < 10 years old did not express a preference.
Questionnaires, Adult, Chi-Square Distribution, Adolescent, Attitude of Health Personnel, Lasers, Statistics, Dentists, 610, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Dental Equipment, Statistics, Nonparametric, Child, Preschool, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Nonparametric, Preschool, Child, Dental Cavity Preparation, Aged
Questionnaires, Adult, Chi-Square Distribution, Adolescent, Attitude of Health Personnel, Lasers, Statistics, Dentists, 610, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Dental Equipment, Statistics, Nonparametric, Child, Preschool, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Nonparametric, Preschool, Child, Dental Cavity Preparation, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 40 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
