
doi: 10.1038/oby.2003.97
pmid: 12740459
AbstractObjective: Few weight loss supplements are clinically tested for efficacy, yet their proliferation continues. Chitosan‐based supplements are sold as fat trappers and fat magnets. They purportedly block fat absorption and cause weight loss without food restriction. We quantified the in vivo effect of a chitosan product on fat absorption.Research Methods and Procedures: Participants (n = 15) consumed five meals per day for 12 days. Energy intake was not restricted. Participants consumed no supplements during a 4‐day control period and two capsules five times per day (4.5 g chitosan/d), 30 minutes before each meal, during a 4‐day supplement period. All feces were collected from days 2 to 12. Oral charcoal markers permitted division of the feces into two periods. The two fecal pools were analyzed for fat content.Results: Participants were male, 26.3 ± 5.9 years old, BMI of 25.6 ± 2.3 kg/m2. Subjects consumed 133 ± 23 g of fat/d and 12.91 ± 1.79 MJ/d (3084 ± 427 kcal/d). Individual meals averaged 26.3 ± 9.3 g of fat. With chitosan supplementation at 10 capsules/day, fecal fat excretion increased by 1.1 ± 1.8 g/d (p = 0.02), from 6.1 ± 1.2 to 7.2 ± 1.8 g/d.Discussion: The effect of chitosan on fat absorption is clinically negligible. Far from being a fat trapper, at 0.11 ± 0.18 g of fat trapped per 0.45‐g capsule or 1.1 g (9.9 kcal) fat trapped per day, this product would have no significant effect on energy balance. The fat trapping claims associated with chitosan are unsubstantiated.
Adult, Male, Chitosan, Chitin, Dietary Fats, Diet Records, Feces, Intestinal Absorption, Dietary Supplements, Weight Loss, Humans, Anti-Obesity Agents
Adult, Male, Chitosan, Chitin, Dietary Fats, Diet Records, Feces, Intestinal Absorption, Dietary Supplements, Weight Loss, Humans, Anti-Obesity Agents
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 96 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
