
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro734
pmid: 15040174
With the number of published microbial genomes now in excess of 100, any new genome that is sequenced is likely to have a close relative available for comparison. Indeed, it is increasingly difficult to perform any genomic analysis that is not comparative. This should, however, not be seen as a drawback; it is often the case that a large amount of information can be drawn from these comparisons, especially between closely related organisms. Several genome sequences published recently indicate the value of comparisons at the genomic level.
570, Bacteria, Helicobacter pylori, Virulence, Streptococcus pyogenes, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Corynebacterium, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena, Mycobacterium bovis, 004, Campylobacter jejuni, Helicobacter hepaticus, Genome, Bacterial
570, Bacteria, Helicobacter pylori, Virulence, Streptococcus pyogenes, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Corynebacterium, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena, Mycobacterium bovis, 004, Campylobacter jejuni, Helicobacter hepaticus, Genome, Bacterial
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
