
pmid: 23306458
Characterization of pluripotent stem cells is required for the registration of stem cell lines and allows for an impartial and objective comparison of the results obtained when generating multiple lines. It is therefore crucial to establish specific, fast and reliable protocols to detect the hallmarks of pluripotency. Such protocols should include immunocytochemistry (takes 2 d), identification of the three germ layers in in vitro-derived embryoid bodies by immunocytochemistry (immunodetection takes 3 d) and detection of differentiation markers in in vivo-generated teratomas by immunohistochemistry (differentiation marker detection takes 4 d). Standardization of the immunodetection protocols used ensures minimum variations owing to the source, the animal species, the endogenous fluorescence or the inability to collect large amounts of cells, thereby yielding results as fast as possible without loss of quality. This protocol provides a description of all the immunodetection procedures necessary to characterize mouse and human stem cell lines in different circumstances.
Pluripotent Stem Cells, Cell Culture Techniques, Flow Cytometry, DNA Fingerprinting, Immunohistochemistry, Mice, Species Specificity, Karyotyping, Animals, Humans, Protein Isoforms, Octamer Transcription Factor-3, Embryoid Bodies, Germ Layers, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
Pluripotent Stem Cells, Cell Culture Techniques, Flow Cytometry, DNA Fingerprinting, Immunohistochemistry, Mice, Species Specificity, Karyotyping, Animals, Humans, Protein Isoforms, Octamer Transcription Factor-3, Embryoid Bodies, Germ Layers, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 144 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
