
AbstractThe random walk formalism is used across a wide range of applications, from modelling share prices to predicting population genetics. Likewise, quantum walks have shown much potential as a framework for developing new quantum algorithms. Here we present explicit efficient quantum circuits for implementing continuous-time quantum walks on the circulant class of graphs. These circuits allow us to sample from the output probability distributions of quantum walks on circulant graphs efficiently. We also show that solving the same sampling problem for arbitrary circulant quantum circuits is intractable for a classical computer, assuming conjectures from computational complexity theory. This is a new link between continuous-time quantum walks and computational complexity theory and it indicates a family of tasks that could ultimately demonstrate quantum supremacy over classical computers. As a proof of principle, we experimentally implement the proposed quantum circuit on an example circulant graph using a two-qubit photonics quantum processor.
/dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/quantum_information_SRI, Quantum Physics, Science, Q, FOS: Physical sciences, name=QETLabs, 530, Article, 004, name=Bristol Quantum Information Institute, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/qetlabs; name=QETLabs, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/qetlabs, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/quantum_information_SRI; name=Bristol Quantum Information Institute, Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
/dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/quantum_information_SRI, Quantum Physics, Science, Q, FOS: Physical sciences, name=QETLabs, 530, Article, 004, name=Bristol Quantum Information Institute, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/qetlabs; name=QETLabs, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/qetlabs, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/quantum_information_SRI; name=Bristol Quantum Information Institute, Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 91 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
