
E ach year at the end of June, Thomson Reuters releases journal impact factors (IFs), a measure reflecting the average number of citations to articles published in each journal over the two previous years and generally accepted as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal among others serving a particular field. As discussed below, one can debate the wisdom of reliance on this particular citation metric, although Molecular Therapy has indeed benefited from many consecutive years of increases in the IF. Coupled with our commitment to rapid and fair review, the increases in our IF have been key to our being able to attract high-quality research papers in cell and gene therapy.
Pharmacology, Publishing, Drug Discovery, Genetics, Molecular Medicine, Journal Impact Factor, Periodicals as Topic, Molecular Biology
Pharmacology, Publishing, Drug Discovery, Genetics, Molecular Medicine, Journal Impact Factor, Periodicals as Topic, Molecular Biology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
