
Biological robustness is a principle that may shed light on system‐level characteristics of biological systems. One intriguing aspect of the concept of biological robustness is the possible existence of intrinsic trade‐offs among robustness, fragility, performance, and so on. At the same time, whether such trade‐offs hold regardless of the situation or hold only under specific conditions warrants careful investigation. In this paper, we reassess this concept and argue that biological robustness may hold only when a system is sufficiently optimized and that it may not be conserved when there is room for optimization in its design. Several testable predictions and implications for cell culture experiments are presented.
Medicine (General), suboptimality, QH301-705.5, trade‐offs, Systems Biology, robustness, Models, Biological, R5-920, evolution, portfolio selection, Biology (General), Selection, Genetic, Cells, Cultured, Perspectives
Medicine (General), suboptimality, QH301-705.5, trade‐offs, Systems Biology, robustness, Models, Biological, R5-920, evolution, portfolio selection, Biology (General), Selection, Genetic, Cells, Cultured, Perspectives
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 45 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
