
Prior to the genome-wide association era, candidate gene studies were a major approach in schizophrenia genetics. In this invited review, we consider the current status of 25 historical candidate genes for schizophrenia (e.g., COMT, DISC1, DTNBP1, and NRG1). The initial study for 24 of these genes explicitly evaluated common variant hypotheses about schizophrenia. Our evaluation included a meta-analysis of the candidate gene literature, incorporation of the results of the largest genomic study yet published for schizophrenia, ratings from informed researchers who have published on these genes, and ratings from 24 schizophrenia geneticists. On the basis of current empirical evidence and mostly consensual assessments of informed opinion, it appears that the historical candidate gene literature did not yield clear insights into the genetic basis of schizophrenia. A likely reason why historical candidate gene studies did not achieve their primary aims is inadequate statistical power. However, the considerable efforts embodied in these early studies unquestionably set the stage for current successes in genomic approaches to schizophrenia.
History, PubMed, Genotype, Medical and Health Sciences, History, 21st Century, Article, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Humans, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Aetiology, Psychiatry, Human Genome, Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, Genetic Variation, Genomics, Biological Sciences, History, 20th Century, 21st Century, Brain Disorders, 20th Century, Mental Health, Schizophrenia, Mental health, Genome-Wide Association Study
History, PubMed, Genotype, Medical and Health Sciences, History, 21st Century, Article, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Humans, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Aetiology, Psychiatry, Human Genome, Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, Genetic Variation, Genomics, Biological Sciences, History, 20th Century, 21st Century, Brain Disorders, 20th Century, Mental Health, Schizophrenia, Mental health, Genome-Wide Association Study
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 278 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% |
