
Endogenous opioid and cannabinoid systems are thought to act synergistically regulating antinociceptive and reward mechanisms. To further understand the human implications of the interaction between these two systems, we investigated the role of the common, functional missense variant Pro129Thr of the gene coding fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), the major degrading enzyme of endocannabinoids, on psychophysical and neurotransmitter (dopaminergic, opioid) responses to pain and placebo-induced analgesia in humans. FAAH Pro129/Pro129 homozygotes, who constitute nearly half of the population, reported higher placebo analgesia and more positive affective states immediately and 24 h after placebo administration; no effects on pain report in the absence of placebo were observed. Pro129/Pro129 homozygotes also showed greater placebo-induced μ-opioid, but not D(2/3) dopaminergic, enhancements in neurotransmission in regions known involved in placebo effects. These results show that a common genetic variation affecting the function of the cannabinoid system is serving as a probe to demonstrate the involvement of cannabinoid and opioid transmitters on the formation of placebo effects.
Adult, Male, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Functional Neuroimaging, Homozygote, Mutation, Missense, Receptors, Dopamine D3, Receptors, Opioid, mu, Brain, Placebo Effect, Synaptic Transmission, Article, Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolases, Amidohydrolases, Affect, Radioligand Assay, Young Adult, Positron-Emission Tomography, Humans, Female, Pain Measurement
Adult, Male, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Functional Neuroimaging, Homozygote, Mutation, Missense, Receptors, Dopamine D3, Receptors, Opioid, mu, Brain, Placebo Effect, Synaptic Transmission, Article, Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolases, Amidohydrolases, Affect, Radioligand Assay, Young Adult, Positron-Emission Tomography, Humans, Female, Pain Measurement
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 86 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
