
doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.58
pmid: 22595940
Sanger sequencing is a mainstay for the identification of gene mutations used in molecular diagnostic laboratories. However, in autosomal recessive disorders, failure of allele amplification can occur for a variety of reasons, leading heterozygous mutations to appear homozygous. We sought to investigate the frequency at which apparently homozygous mutations detected by Sanger sequencing in our laboratory appeared homozygous due to other molecular etiologies.A review of 12,406 cases from 40 different genetic tests that were submitted to the Medical Genetics Laboratories at Baylor College of Medicine for Sanger sequence analysis was performed. The molecular status of apparently homozygous cases was further investigated by testing parents using various methods.A total of 291 cases of apparent homozygosity were identified, ranging from 0 to 37% of the total per gene. One-third of the apparently homozygous cases were followed up by parental testing. Parental carrier status was confirmed in 88% of the cases. Of the cases in which parental carrier status could not be confirmed, deletions encompassing point mutations, allele dropout due to single-nucleotide polymorphisms at primer sites, and uniparental isodisomy were observed.For individuals with autosomal recessive disorders and apparently homozygous mutations, confirmation by parental testing can rule out other causes of apparent homozygosity, including allele dropout, copy number variations, and uniparental isodisomy.
Comparative Genomic Hybridization, DNA Copy Number Variations, Genetic Carrier Screening, Homozygote, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Uniparental Disomy, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Research Design, Humans, Algorithms, Alleles
Comparative Genomic Hybridization, DNA Copy Number Variations, Genetic Carrier Screening, Homozygote, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Uniparental Disomy, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Research Design, Humans, Algorithms, Alleles
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
