Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Cell Researcharrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Cell Research
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Cell Research
Article . 2010 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
Cell Research
Article . 2010
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

AID for reprogramming

Authors: Suneet, Agarwal; George Q, Daley;

AID for reprogramming

Abstract

Five decades of nuclear transfer (NT) experiments have established a key principle in developmental genetics - despite vast functional differences, virtually all of the cells in an adult organism maintain an identical genome 1. Studies in several species have shown that the nucleus of a differentiated cell can be reprogrammed by exposure to egg cytoplasm, which re-initiates an embryonic genetic program in the transferred genome and permits the development of an identical adult organism (i.e. cloning). The demonstration that one adult cell can give rise to any other cell type has fueled tremendous interest in therapeutic applications, wherein a patient's own healthy cells would be reprogrammed to replace other cell types that have been damaged by disease or age. However, despite a half century of NT experiments in several species, the process by which genomes are reprogrammed remains largely unknown, in large part due to the inefficiency of NT and experimental limitations in manipulating the egg cytoplasm. Other, more tractable methods exist to reprogram cells from an adult to embryonic (or pluripotent) phenotype, including cell fusion 2 and direct reprogramming to create induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells 3. In a recent report, Bhutani et al. 4 begin to shed some light into the “black box” of reprogramming (Figure 1). By demonstrating the rapid and efficient induction of pluripotency-associated genes in human fibroblasts after fusion to mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells, and the perturbation of this induction when a candidate factor (Activation-induced Cytidine Deaminase, or AID) is disrupted, the authors provide new insights into the mechanisms regulating the path to pluripotency. As importantly, in doing so, they bolster emerging evidence that AID may be involved in the elusive process of active DNA demethylation.

Keywords

Homeodomain Proteins, AICDA (Activation-Induced Cytidine Deaminase), Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Cellular Reprogramming, Cell Fusion, Mice, Cytidine Deaminase, Animals, Humans, RNA, Small Interfering, Octamer Transcription Factor-3

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
bronze