Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Basis of false-positive glucagon tests for pheochromocytoma

Authors: O, Kuchel; P, Hamet; N T, Buu; P, Larochelle;

Basis of false-positive glucagon tests for pheochromocytoma

Abstract

In more than half of 67 patients suspected of having pheochromocytoma, glucagon stimulation increased plasma free norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine (E) 50% or more, with rising blood pressure or pulse rate; only three patients, however, harbored a pheochromocytoma. A low degree of catecholamine conjugation accounts for most of the false-positive results. In patients with low conjugated NE +E there was a greater rise in free NE +E and free E as well as in pulse rate after glucagon stimulation than in those with normal levels of conjugated NE+E. Glucagon-sensitive adenylate cyclase was found in pheochromocytomas but not in a functional adrenocortical adenomas. After sham administration of glucagon, there were rises in blood pressure but not in free NE or E in four patients. The glucagon-induced catecholamine test can be false-positive in hyperadrenergic essential hypertensive patients with abnormally low conjugated NE +E. Saline alone in a sham glucagon test in susceptible patients raises systolic blood pressure and pulse rate, and therefore, if plasma free NE and E are measured and found not to rise this type of false-positive result can be eliminated.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Epinephrine, Adrenal Gland Neoplasms, Blood Pressure, Pheochromocytoma, Glucagon, Norepinephrine, Humans, False Positive Reactions, Female, Pulse, Adenylyl Cyclases

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    18
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
18
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!