Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Bone Marrow Transpla...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Bone Marrow Transplantation
Article . 2008 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Hematopoietic SCT in patients with a history of invasive fungal infection

Authors: P, Zhang; A, Song; Z, Wang; S, Feng; L, Qiu; M, Han;

Hematopoietic SCT in patients with a history of invasive fungal infection

Abstract

Earlier invasive fungal infections (IFI) put recipients of hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) at a high risk of IFI-related mortality. We retrospectively assessed the feasibility of HSCT for patients with a history of IFI and the efficacy of secondary prophylaxis. From January 2001 to December 2007, 49 patients with a history of IFI underwent HSCT and most of them received broad-spectrum antifungal agents as secondary prophylaxis. After a median follow-up of 355 days (15-967), nine patients experienced failure of IFI prophylaxis, including three cases of IFI-related death, leading to a 2-year cumulative incidence of 18.4 and 6.1%, respectively. Four risk factors for the failure of prophylaxis were found, namely time interval from the diagnosis of IFI to transplantation, residual diseases before transplantation, infection with CMV and use of corticosteroid for the treatment of GVHD. A similar outcome can be achieved in recipients of Auto- and Auto-HSCT. Despite a higher risk of post-transplant progression, residual features of IFI did not affect the overall outcome of HSCT. In conclusion, a history of IFI and residual features are not contraindications to HSCT and secondary prophylaxis by broad-spectrum antifungal agents can protect patients from relapse or progression of an earlier infection.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Antifungal Agents, Contraindications, Incidence, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Antibiotic Prophylaxis, Treatment Outcome, Mycoses, Risk Factors, Humans, Transplantation, Homologous, Female, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    24
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
24
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze