
In their recent assessment of trends in cancer research since the establishment of the National Cancer Research Network in 2001, Stead et al (2011) reported significant improvement in both patient recruitment and study delivery over the intervening time period. This has been largely attributed to the development of the UK cancer centres, an initiative similar to those seen across the EU27 (Ringborg et al, 2008) and the United States (Nass et al, 2010). In the United States, the move towards service centralisation has, however, made it increasingly difficult for clinicians working outside designated departments to maintain a research output and bibliometric profile sufficient to facilitate future support and funding (Nass et al, 2010). This emerging organisational structure for cancer research holds particular significance for those working in surgical oncology.
Editorial, Neoplasms, Research, Humans, Cooperative Behavior, Medical Oncology
Editorial, Neoplasms, Research, Humans, Cooperative Behavior, Medical Oncology
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
