
doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.19
pmid: 20445505
The Women in Gastroenterology Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) conducted a survey among physician members of the ACG to examine the influence of mentoring on career satisfaction. The survey found that the overall rates of career satisfaction and mentorship are high, and that a majority of those without mentors wish that they had had one. Having a mentor who was described as either very effective or extremely effective was associated with higher career satisfaction, but was reported by only 59% of respondents. Factors associated with effective mentoring include frequent meetings, career mentoring, and mentors who are at the rank of professor. If these mentoring rates are representative of rates in the United States, approximately 170 gastroenterology fellows lack mentorship but wish they had it, and 325 more have, at best, moderately effective mentors. We should consider instituting national programs to provide trainees with effective mentorship.
Adult, Male, Career Choice, Interprofessional Relations, Mentors, Gastroenterology, Internship and Residency, Middle Aged, Job Satisfaction, United States, Cross-Sectional Studies, Education, Medical, Graduate, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Clinical Competence
Adult, Male, Career Choice, Interprofessional Relations, Mentors, Gastroenterology, Internship and Residency, Middle Aged, Job Satisfaction, United States, Cross-Sectional Studies, Education, Medical, Graduate, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Clinical Competence
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 28 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
