
doi: 10.1038/82082
When scientists at the California-based pharmaceutical company, Immune Response, proposed changes to James Kahn's article on the failure of the company's experimental AIDS treatment, Kahn refused. The University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) researcher perceived the company's post-hoc analysis to be "spin." The company described it as good science. When Kahn submitted the study to the Journal of the American Medical Association, they immediately agreed to publish it, accompanied by separate articles on the perils of industry-sponsored research. The story quickly became front-page news.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
