
doi: 10.1038/454692a
pmid: 18685682
The processes used to charge athletes with cheating are often based on flawed statistics and flawed logic, says Donald A. Berry.
Doping in Sports, Male, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Substance Abuse Detection, Sample Size, Humans, False Positive Reactions, Female, Probability, Sports
Doping in Sports, Male, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Substance Abuse Detection, Sample Size, Humans, False Positive Reactions, Female, Probability, Sports
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 64 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
