
doi: 10.1038/35012129
pmid: 10821259
People who can't understand words are better at picking up lies about emotions. People are usually no better than chance at detecting lies from a liar's demeanour1,2, even when clues to deceit are evident from facial expression and tone of voice3. We suspected that people who are unable to understand words (aphasics) may be better at spotting liars, so we tested their performance as lie detectors. We found that aphasics were significantly better at detecting lies about emotion than people with no language impairment, suggesting that loss of language skills may be associated with a superior ability to detect the truth.
Language Tests, Emotions, Aphasia, Lie Detection, Humans, Language
Language Tests, Emotions, Aphasia, Lie Detection, Humans, Language
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 91 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
