
doi: 10.1038/26481
pmid: 9759727
Although many anecdotal reports indicate that marijuana and its active constituent, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-9-THC), may reduce pain sensation, studies of humans have produced inconsistent results. In animal studies, the apparent pain-suppressing effects of delta-9-THC and other cannabinoid drugs are confounded by motor deficits. Here we show that a brainstem circuit that contributes to the pain-suppressing effects of morphine is also required for the analgesic effects of cannabinoids. Inactivation of the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) prevents the analgesia but not the motor deficits produced by systemically administered cannabinoids. Furthermore, cannabinoids produce analgesia by modulating RVM neuronal activity in a manner similar to, but pharmacologically dissociable from, that of morphine. We also show that endogenous cannabinoids tonically regulate pain thresholds in part through the modulation of RVM neuronal activity. These results show that analgesia produced by cannabinoids and opioids involves similar brainstem circuitry and that cannabinoids are indeed centrally acting analgesics with a new mechanism of action.
Male, Neurons, Medulla Oblongata, Morphine, Cannabinoids, Muscimol, Morpholines, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic, Motor Activity, Naphthalenes, Benzoxazines, Rats, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Piperidines, Neural Pathways, Animals, Pyrazoles, Analgesia, Receptors, Cannabinoid, GABA Agonists
Male, Neurons, Medulla Oblongata, Morphine, Cannabinoids, Muscimol, Morpholines, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic, Motor Activity, Naphthalenes, Benzoxazines, Rats, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Piperidines, Neural Pathways, Animals, Pyrazoles, Analgesia, Receptors, Cannabinoid, GABA Agonists
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 379 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
