
doi: 10.1038/263762a0
WITH the description of further specimens1,2 there has been a resurgence of interest in Archaeopteryx. Although there is no final agreement on whether it was mainly arboreal or terrestrial, recent opinion3 seems to favour the latter. There has been discussion on its reptile origins4–6 and on its ability to fly and the general problem of the evolution of powered flight3,7–12. However, most of these studies have been made by specialists who are not ornithologists and who usually tend to extrapolate from reptile forms and behaviour in their discussions. Whatever its precursors, Archaeopteryx is regarded as a bird and to interpret adequately such evidence as we have we must consider it in relation to what we know of birds as well as reptiles.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
