
doi: 10.1038/258248a0
pmid: 811992
SOMATIC mutation has been considered a likely initiating step in chemical carcinogenesis1–3, chiefly because of the close correlation between the mutagenic and carcinogenic activity of various chemicals4–6. Study of cells from patients with disease predisposing to a high incidence of cancer, such as xeroderma pigmentosum and Fanconi's anaemia, has suggested that defective DNA repair is correlated with this predisposition to malignant transformation. When cells are transformed by 3-methylcholanthrene7, 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4NQO)8, or X irradiation9–11, division is necessary soon after treatment to fix the transformation: if treated cells are unable to grow the transformation is not fixed. These results could be explained if DNA damage induced by a carcinogen is converted into a stable and replicable structural change only by means of DNA replication before the intervention of error-free repair mechanisms. The model of mutagenesis12–14 based on evidence obtained with micro-organisms suggests that errors introduced by an error-prone postreplication repair mechanism are the principal source of mutation. Furthermore, caffeine inhibits “postreplication repair” (presumably an error-prone mechanism) but not excision repair (presumably error-free) in rodent cells15–19. I now report that caffeine reduces the transformation frequency of mouse cells treated with 4NQO. This supports the somatic mutation theory of cell transformation.
Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, DNA Repair, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Caffeine, Nitroquinolines, 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide, Cell Line
Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, DNA Repair, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Caffeine, Nitroquinolines, 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide, Cell Line
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 76 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
