Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Naturearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Nature
Article . 1972 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
Nature
Article . 1973
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Technique for Studying Sperm Maturation in vitro

Authors: M C, Orgebin-Crist; P L, Tichenor;

A Technique for Studying Sperm Maturation in vitro

Abstract

IN mammals spermatozoa mature while passing through the epididymis. In the rabbit there are virtually no fertile spermatozoa in the caput epididymidis and fertilizing ability is acquired when, the spermatozoa pass through the corpus epididymidis1,2. Spermatozoa retained by ligatures, in the proximal corpus develop a normal fertilizing ability in 24 h, but never become fertile when retained for 1 to 12 days in the proximal caput epididymidis3,4. These results strongly suggest that the factors governing the maturation process are not intrinsic to the spermatozoa. To determine whether the development of the fertilizing ability can be achieved similarly when the proximal corpus is maintained 24 h in vitro in organ culture, we used the technique described below. Testes were reached aseptically by means of an abdominal incision, and connective tissue and fat were gently peeled from the epididymis of the anaesthetized animal. The tissue was then removed; the proximal corpus and distal corpus were separated and each placed in 1 ml. of a solution of 0.05% pronase or of 0.5% clostridium peptidase for 30 to 60 min at 31° C. The epididymal tubule was gently unconvoluted and placed unbroken on an agar strip. Trowell's5 organ culture technique was used with Steinberger's6 modification. The medium was Eagle's7 minimal medium with 15% foetal calf serum and 100 I.U. penicillin-streptomycin mixture. The gas phase was air containing 5% CO2, and the cultures were incubated at 31° C, pH 7.0±0.2. A 2 mm segment from the epididymis just distal to the distal corpus was cut up in 0.5 ml. of the same tissue culture medium. The sperm suspension was incubated in a test-tube for 24 h under the same conditions. After 24 h the epididymal tubule placed in organ culture was removed, cut up in 1 ml. Hank's solution and the debris removed. The two sperm suspensions were injected through both uterine walls of one or two does, which were injected with an ovulatory dose of 50 I.U. of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) at the time of insemination. Females were killed 26 h after injection of HCG. The oviducts were flushed and the eggs recovered were examined for the presence of pronuclei or of cleavage, taken as evidence of fertilization. Nuclear details were clarified with acetocarmine staining after fixation in 1:3 acetic alcohol8. The male was then killed, the contralateral testis and epididymis removed and the proximal corpus and distal corpus were separated, cut up in 0.5 ml Hank's solution and the debris removed. Sperm suspensions were inseminated in 1 or 2 does as described above. A total of 13 males and 58 females were used.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Epididymis, Male, Time Factors, Spermatozoa, Organ Culture Techniques, Cell Movement, Pregnancy, Fertilization, Animals, Female, Rabbits, Spermatogenesis, Insemination, Artificial

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    23
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
23
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!