
doi: 10.1038/229034a0
pmid: 16059059
IN a series of classic articles, Weber1–3 derived the equations of motion and the response of mass quadrupole detectors to tensor gravitational waves. He has also constructed a detector which is a cylindrical rod tuned to its fundamental longitudinal acoustic resonance. These devices (class 1 detectors) have a definite relationship between the resonant frequency and the dimensions, in consequence of which they become very large (and expensive) at low frequencies. Using a somewhat arbitrary criterion (discussed later), one may state that class 1 detectors are difficult to build at frequencies below 1,000 Hz. There are other mechanically resonant devices (for example, tuning forks, rings and hollow “squares”), which we call class 2 detectors, which have a different relationship between the resonant frequency and their dimensions. Application of the same arbitrary criterion to class 2 detectors establishes that their useful frequency range can be extended to ∼30 Hz and that their sensitivity at the lower frequencies is comparable with class 1 detectors. Thus class 2 detectors are useful in a frequency range not easily accessible to class 1 detectors.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
