
doi: 10.1038/2271151b0
pmid: 4915993
THE effects of marijuana are not consistent from subject to subject1. Any discussion of its effect on human memory (such as refs. 2 and 3) must therefore consider whether valid generalizations can be drawn from the subjects who have been examined. One way of minimizing individual differences is to use subjects as their own controls, as is done in the present study which investigates the effects of marijuana on the recall of narrative material.
Adult, Male, Clinical Trials as Topic, Memory, Smoking, Humans, Female, Cannabis, Language
Adult, Male, Clinical Trials as Topic, Memory, Smoking, Humans, Female, Cannabis, Language
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 71 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
