
doi: 10.1038/227054a0
pmid: 16057823
THE work of Humason, Mayall and Sandage1 and the more recent work of Sandage2–5 and Peterson6 show that the dispersion in the absolute magnitude of the first brightest galaxies in rich clusters of galaxies is only 0.3 magnitude. Peebles7 suggested that this small dispersion is simply the consequence of the cluster luminosity function and compared the distribution predicted by the statistical theory with the observations of Humason, Mayall and Sandage1. I have shown8 how the distributions predicted by the statistical theory vary with the richness of the cluster of galaxies and has compared the predicted distributions with the observations of Humason, Mayall and Sandage1, and with his own observations6. But Peach9 considered that the statistical theory is inadequate when he compared the distributions calculated from the statistical theory with new data of Sandage.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
