
doi: 10.1038/214306a0
pmid: 6034253
RELYING heavily on the conclusions of Beer1, Walls2 and Brett3 assert that fishes are generally near-sighted. Although Beer found evidence by retinoscopy of far-sightedness in fishes, he assumed that retinoscopic reflexion occurs from the front retinal surface and thus falsely concluded that fishes are near sighted. By examining the eye through a +10 dioptre lens with a dissecting microscope equipped for vertical illumination, Baylor and Shaw4 found that the reflexion comes from the guanine layer behind the retina. On the other hand, far-sightedness in fishes was reported by Rochon-Duvigneaud5 and Verrier6,7. Moreover, Verrier7 found that on replacing the back of the retina with a screen, the image focused on the screen.
Fishes, Accommodation, Ocular, Animals, Retina, Vision, Ocular
Fishes, Accommodation, Ocular, Animals, Retina, Vision, Ocular
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
