
doi: 10.1038/207220a0
pmid: 5886127
THE classification of Candida albicans into two serological groups on the basis of agglutination tests was first reported by Hasenclever and Mitchell1, and both in the original and subsequent papers2–4 these authors and their colleagues referred to group A and group B strains. The findings were confirmed by me5,6 using a double-diffusion method, and, for the sake of conformity, similarly using the word ‘group’ with reference to the serological division within the species. Nevertheless, it must be apparent that this terminology is not consistent with that relating to the serological classification of other microbiological species such as Pneumococcus and Haemophilus influenzae, where the word ‘type’ is employed, and that confusion may arise if the word ‘group’ is used to describe not only an antigen (group antigen) which is common to more than one species of a particular genus, but also the serological division within a species.
In Vitro Techniques, Candida
In Vitro Techniques, Candida
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
