
doi: 10.1038/1941303a0
FOR some time it has been suspected that the most relevant parameter when using electric shock as a stimulus is the applied wattage. Forbes and Bernstein1, Gilmer2, Hill et al.3, Campbell and Teghtsoonian4, Green5, all found evidence to support this contention. Although constant current and constant voltage outputs have long been in use, a device capable of supplying a constant power output compensating for the changes in impedance found in any biological circuit has not hitherto been available.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
