<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.1038/193364a0
pmid: 14493937
THERE has been considerable speculation in recent years on the nature of the current carriers in electrical conductivity of proteins. Up to 1943, the prevailing opinion was that the conductivity of proteins with adsorbed water was ionic. Then Baxter1 suggested that his results were more consistent with an electronic conduction mechanism both in the dry and wet states. From their theoretical work, Evans and Gergely2 concluded that dry proteins should be electronic semi-conductors with an interband gap of about 3.0 eV. Proteins, in the dry and wet states, are indeed semiconductors, but with activation energies less than 3.0 eV. More recent experiments by King and Medley3 on very wet proteins (> 15 per cent adsorbed water) have shown that the passage of a d.c. current produces hydrogen by an electrolytic process in quantitative agreement with theory, Riehl4 has suggested that the conductivity of wet proteins is due to oriented water in an ice-like configuration. Cardew and Eley5 believe that dry proteins are electronic semi-conductors, and that in wet proteins the current carriers are probably protons.
Electric Conductivity, Proteins, Biochemistry
Electric Conductivity, Proteins, Biochemistry
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 105 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |