
doi: 10.1038/190101a0
pmid: 13694821
IN a recent communication Parry, Holliday and Blaxter1 reopened the question of the chloride-secreting cells of the gills of fish and, in agreement with Bevelander's2 arguments, they brought new indirect evidence against Keys and Willmer's theory3 and Copeland's4 conclusions.
Gills, Eels, Chlorides, Animals, Anguilla
Gills, Eels, Chlorides, Animals, Anguilla
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
