<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.1038/184453a0
CARLILL'S attempt1 to dispel confusion in the use of the Ohm's law analogy in blood circulation theory requires further clarification, since it is only the incorrect application of this analogy that needs to be abandoned not the analogy itself, but it raises an important point. This is confirmed by Burton2 when he insists that, for vascular circuits: Resistance to flow (R) = For a definition consistent with the electrical analogy we must have R = (P—p)/F where p is the critical closing pressure as referred to by Carlill. This gives F = P/R — p/R, which is of the form y = mx — c since p/R is constant for any single one of the lines in Carlill's Fig. 1 and gives the same result for dF/dP as in Burton's equation (4) derived from his incomplete expression of form y = mx.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |